← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6069/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Yogesh Shivajirao Gopulwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav6 pages

1 wp 6069.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6069 OF 2015 Yogesh Shivajirao Gopulwad WRIT PETITION NO. 6142 OF 2015 Manisha Prabhau Kolhe WRIT PETITION NO. 6143 OF 2015 Pragati Appa Nanderkar WRIT PETITION NO. 6144 OF 2015 Kumari Rutuja Kiran Sapkal

2 wp 6069.15 WRIT PETITION NO. 6146 OF 2015 Rameshwar Laxman Kaudewar WRIT PETITION NO. 6147 OF 2015 Mangesh Ashokrao Sidhewad WRIT PETITION NO. 6148 OF 2015 Vedkumar Hanmanlu Ghantaji u/g father Hanmanlu Sayyanna Ghantaji WRIT PETITION NO. 6149 OF 2015 Diksha Vinayakrao Kogurwar

3 wp 6069.15 WRIT PETITION NO. 6150 OF 2015 Vitthal Narsing Sallawar WRIT PETITION NO. 6151 OF 2015 Megha Devanand Maldode WRIT PETITION NO. 6152 OF 2015 Sarika Gangadhar Anmulwad WRIT PETITION NO. 6153 OF 2015 Tushar Dhanraj Jamadar

4 wp 6069.15 WRIT PETITION NO. 6154 OF 2015 Shriniwas Dhondiba Waghmode WRIT PETITION NO. 6155 OF 2015 Aakanksha Ramchandra Malshetwar Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for Petitioners in W. P. No. 6069/2015, 6142/2015, 6146/2015, 6147/2015 and W. P. No. 6155/2015.

Shri Arun H. Koralkar, Advocate for the Petitioner in W. P. No. 6143 of 2015.

Shri Anil S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner in W. P. No. 6144 of 2015.

Shri Pratap V. Jadhavar, Advocate for Petitioners in W. P. No. 6148/2015, 6149/2015, 6150/2015, 6151/2015, 6152/2015, 6153/2015 and W. P. No. 6154/2015.

Shri G. K. Thigle, Addl.G.P., Shri D. B. Bhange, Smt. S. A. Dhumal and Shri K. M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for Respondent/State in respective matters.

Shri Ashok B. Tele and Shri K. D. Bade Patil, Advocates for Respondent/Committee in respective matters.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 19TH JUNE, 2015.

5 wp 6069.15 PER COURT :

.

In all these matters directions are sought against respondents to accept the preference form of petitioners without insisting for validity certificates of the students from the Scheduled Tribe category.

2.

The learned Assistant Government Pleaders have placed on record the circular issued by the State stating that even from the students of the Scheduled Tribe category, the validity certificates would not be insisted and the preference form would be accepted on the basis of the undertaking and those students will have to submit the proof of submission of application showing that matter/proposal is referred to the Committee for validation of caste certificate.

3.

In the light of the above, the major grievance of petitioners stands redressed.

4.

In all these writ petitions, the proposals for validation are pending with the Committee. The learned counsel for the Committee in respective writ petitions submit that, considering large number of proposals pending with the Committee, it would take some time for deciding validation proceedings. 5.

The respondent/committee shall endeavour to decide the

6 wp 6069.15 validation proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a period of one (01) year from today. The petitioners shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the validation proceedings. The writ petitions accordingly are disposed of. No costs. [ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 15