Chandrakant Kundalik Bharud v. Sau. Sushilabai Chandrakant Bharud

G.A.Ghule 1/1 wp 355.02.sxw [P.A.]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

Criminal Writ Petition No.355 Of 2002.

Chandrakant Kundalik Bharud

Versus

Sushilabai Chandrakant Bharud, Appearance => Mr. A.B. Gatne, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. P.F. Patni, Advocate for the Respondent. Not Present.

CORAM

:

V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATE :

6th FEBRUARY, 2015.

Per Court :- Mr. A.B. Gatne, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. He submitted puris across the bar. Said pursis is taken on record. It is marked as "X" for identification purpose.

[2] By the said pursis, it is pointed out that, present Writ Petition, which is arising out of maintenance proceedings and dispute between the husband and wife is settled amicably out of the court and, therefore, the petitioner does not wants to prosecute the present Writ Petition. In view of the compromise recorded between the parties, as stated in the pursis, present Writ Petition is dismissed.

(V.M. DESHPANDE, J.)