← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1027/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Maroti Vithoba Khandagale And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Nanded And ORS.

2025-06-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme1 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:15724 1 963(i).CA.1027-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1027 OF 2025 IN FAST/15305/2024 MAROTI VITHOBA KHANDAGALE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR NANDED AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Tushar K. Nagarkar Mr. Nagarkar Kiran M.

AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. D. B. Bhange ...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 20th JUNE 2025 PER COURT :

1.

This application is for condonation of delay of 308 days in preferring First Appeal.

2.

Reasons for condonation of delay have not been controverted by the Respondent No.3 which is Acquiring Body. Even appearance has not been caused, despite due service. It is desirable to condone the delay.

3.

Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' on condition that Applicants shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for half of the period of delay. SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB..