Akshay Kaka @ Kakasaheb Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

933-ABA-813-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.813 OF 2022 AKSHAY KAKA @ KAKASAHEB PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rahul R. Karpe APP for Respondent : Mr. S. B. Narawade ...

CORAM :

S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE :

19-07-2022 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent/State.

2.

It has been alleged against the applicant that he has assaulted his mother-in-law with iron rod and caused fracture on lateral end of right clavicle and simple contusion on occipital region with iron rod. The incident happened when the complainant, her daughter and husband went to fetch back the daughter of the present applicant.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that no incident as such happened, but under the garb of custody of the minor child, a false story is cooked. Nothing is to be recovered from the applicant. Therefore, the applicant may be released on anticipatory bail.

933-ABA-813-22.odt 4.

The learned APP would point out that the corresponding injuries have been caused to the mother-in-law Manda. She was assaulted by the applicant with iron rod. The iron rod is yet to be recovered. The applicant was aggressive. He was beating to the injured and threatening them to kill.

5.

Perused the papers and the application. The specific allegations have been levelled against the applicant that he assaulted the first informant / mother-in-law with iron road and caused her fracture on lateral end of right clavicle and simple contusion on occipital region with iron rod. The applicant seems very aggressive. The weapon used in the crime is yet to be recovered. Considering the facts and the allegations levelled against the applicant, this Court is of the view that the applicant is not entitled to anticipatory bail. Hence, the application stands dismissed.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE rrd