← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6142/2024disposed off

Rushikesh Vinayakrao Kalewad Through Guardian Vinayak Mahajan Kalewad v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2024-06-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:11744-DB 1 932-933 & 938-WP-6142-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 WRIT PETITION NO. 6142 OF 2024 RUSHIKESH VINAYAKRAO KALEWAD THROUGH GUARDIAN VINAYAK MAHAJAN KALEWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER AND 933 WRIT PETITION NO. 6143 OF 2024 SHRAVANI BABURAO KALEWAD THROUGH GUARDIAN BABU MAHAJAN KALEWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...

938 WRIT PETITION NO. 6164 OF 2024 SNEHAL BHAGWAN KALEWAD THROUGH GUARDIAN BHAGWAN RAMCHANDRA KALEWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for the Petitioner in all petitions : Mr. Golegaonkar Madhur A. Addl.GP for Respondents/State in WP-6142-2024 : Mr. P.S. Patil AGP for Respondents/State in WP-6143-2024 : Ms. KBP Bharaswadkar AGP for Respondents/State in WP-6164-2024 : Mr. P.P. Dawalkar ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 25 JUNE 2024 PER COURT :

.

Heard.

2 932-933 & 938-WP-6142-2024.doc 2.

The petitioners' proposals are awaiting decision by the Scrutiny Committee for validation of their tribe certificates since October, 2023. 3.

Learned AGP on instructions, submits that the Committee would decide the proposals within two months.

4.

Keeping into account the fact that all these petitioners are stated to have secured good marks and are intending to secure admission in the first round of NEET/UG-2024, we dispose of writ petitions by requesting Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioners' proposals as expeditiously as possible and in any case within three weeks from today. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb..