Shrikant S/O Sudhakar Dahale v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 690 OF 2016 SHRIKANT S/O SUDHAKAR DAHALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocates for Petitioner : Shri Bedre V.S. a/w Shri Biyani S.M. APP for Respondent1 : Shri Karlekar S.G.

...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: July 01, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

I have heard the submissions of Shri Bedre, learned Advocate for the petitioner at length. He has seriously criticized the impugned judgment dated 30.3.2016.

2.

Shri Bedre submits, on instructions, that considering the fact that the original complainant has not termed the receipt dated 3.3.2013 as a promissory note and since the learned Magistrate has also arrived at a conclusion in paragraph No.8 of the impugned order, that the document is merely an acknowledgment receipt and is not a promissory note, the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition. 3.

In the light of the above, this petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d