Shirish Shahaji Boyane v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6013 OF 2016 Shirish s/o Shahaji Boyane Age 18 years, Occu: Student R/o Ujalamb, Tq. Chakur, District: Latur ...

Petitioner

VERSUS

1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Department of Tribal Development Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 2.

The Director of Medical Eeucation and Research, Through the Government Medical Colelge, Aurangabad ...

Respondents.

3.

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad Through its Member Secretary.

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vivek U. Jadhav G.P. for the Respondents State1: Mr. A. B. Girase

CORAM

: R. M. BORDE & K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE :

10th June, 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Borde, J.):

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and the petition is heard for final disposal by the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties.

1/3

3.

Reasonable request made by the petitioner in terms of Prayer clause (B) deserves to be accepted. 4.

The Scrutiny Committee refused to accept the validation proposal directly from the petitioner. The petitioner is desirous of securing admission to the professional course and as such needs validation certificate.

5.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, Respondent No.3- Committee is directed to accept the proposal of the petitioner for verification of his tribe claim directly without insisting for its submission through educational institutions and shall issue to the petitioner, acknowledgment in token of receipt of tribe verification claim.

6.

In view of the directions as above, writ petition is disposed of.

7.

The scrutiny committee shall, in observance of of the procedure prescribed in law, verify the tribe claim of the petitioner and render final decision in the matter as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight months from today.

8.

Rule is made absolute accordingly.

2/3

9.

There shall be no order as to costs.

10.

Learned AGP shall communicate the decision of this Court to the Respondent No.2 forthwith.

11.

Authenticated copy is allowed. Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (R. M. BORDE, J. ) 3/3