← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7752/2025disposed off

Mirza Mahmood Ali Baig Mohasin Ali Baig And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2025-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:23455-DB 52 wp NO. 7752 OF 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7752 OF 2025 MIRZA MAHMOOD ALI BAIG MOHASIN ALI BAIG AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

• Mr. C. V. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioners • Mr. S. D. Ghayal, Addl.GP for Respondents/State • Mr. J. R. Shah, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 • Mr. A. A. Yadkikar, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 • Mr. A. S. Khedkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 6 ...

CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 02.09.2025 PER COURT :

1.

In the order dated 12.08.2025, we have recorded that an interim order of status quo has already been issued by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 553 of 2024. 2.

Insofar as the present petition is concerned, the objections raised by the petitioner in regard to the development plan, are being considered. In fact, the concerned officer, i.e., the Joint Director, Town Planning, Chh. Sambhajinagar has kept the hearing on the objections today, i.e., 02.09.2025 between 02:00 p.m. to 06:00 p.m. Jhs/ 1/2

52 wp NO. 7752 OF 2025 3.

One of the prayer clauses in the present petition is that the objections be decided.

4.

In view of the above, this petition can be conveniently disposed of by issuing appropriate direction to the said authority, i.e., respondent No. 3 - The Deputy Director of Town Planning Department.

5.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondent No. 3 - the Deputy Director of Town Planning to decide the objections of the petitioner within two (02) weeks from today.

6.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Jhs/ 2/2