Kashinath Nathu Patil v. District Collector, Jalgaon And ORS

(1) 950 CA-3699.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3699 OF 2020 IN FAST/16868/2019 WITH CA/3700/2020 IN FAST/16978/2019 WITH CA/3694/2020 IN FAST/16980/2019 WITH CA/3698/2020 IN FAST/16982/2019 WITH CA/3697/2020 IN FAST/16986/2019 WITH CA/3696/2020 IN FAST/16992/2019 WITH CA/3695/2020 IN FAST/16995/2019 WITH CA/3693/2020 IN FAST/17001/2019 WITH CA/3692/2020 IN FAST/17004/2019 KASHINATH NATHU PATIL

VERSUS

DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND OTHERS ...

Ms. Sakshi Kale, Advocate holding for Mr. Ajeet Kale, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. S.W. Mundhe, A.G.P. for respondent No.3.

Mr. Madan Kokate and Mr. V.P. Narwade and Deepak Rasave, holding for Mr. Chetan Jadhav and Mr. P.R. Nangre, Advocates for respondent Acquiring Body in respective applications. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

07.01.2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 380 days in filing the appeals, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned A.G.P. as well as respective learned Counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that the delay is not properly explained and there is also circulation delay.

(2) 950 CA-3699.2020.odt 2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay of 380 days in all these applications stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods and also for the delay in circulating the matters belatedly. 3.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections.

4.

The Civil Applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde