Mangalesh S/O Bhalchandra Bapat v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 Cr.Apln. 3233.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3233 OF 2015 Mangesh s/o Bhalchandra Bapat .... APPLICANT V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... RESPONDENTS .............................

Mr. V.P.Narwade, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. A.S.Shinde, A.P.P. for R.No. 1 - State.

..............................

CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : 26th JUNE, 2015 .............................

PER COURT :

1.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail since the applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 237/2013 registered with Karjat police station, District Ahmednagar for the offences punishable u/s 420,468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Heard Mr. V.P.Narwade, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. A.S.Shinde, learned A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 - State.

2 Cr.Apln. 3233.2015 3.

Mr. Sharadchandra Kadam, President of Bar Association of Karjat lodged report that the present applicant in spite of the fact that he is not an Advocate nor he has enrolled as such, is practicing as an Advocate in the Court in the various cases. In the F.I.R., it is stated that Mr. Palsingekar, learned Judge of the Court below when got suspicion about the present applicant, he demanded Sanad of the present applicant. However, present applicant was unable to show his Sanad to the learned Judge.

4.

According to the present applicant, he is being falsely implicated due to professional jealousy. According to the present applicant, he has registration with the Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh and he has given registration number 468/2011. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar before whom he initially moved application for anticipatory bail, had an occasion to peruse the investigation papers. Learned Judge has observed that the then Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar enquired with the Secretary of Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh in respect of registration number 468/2011. Upon that, it was revealed that the said enrollment pertains to one Ruchika Holkar. That shows that the applicant is appearing in various Courts without there being any authorization and enrollment of any of the Bar Council.

5.

In that view of the matter, no case is made out for grant of interim relief.

3 Cr.Apln. 3233.2015 6.

Hence, present Criminal Application is rejected. [V.M.DESHPANDE, J.] KNP/Cr.Apln. 3233.2015