Jijaram Shrikrushna Bagal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

979-CA-6486-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 979 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6486 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5832 OF 2012 JIJARAM SHRIKRUSHNA BAGAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. M.S. Shaikh h/f Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh Addl. GP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. S.S. Thombre Advocate for Respondent No. 6 : Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY, 2022 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The present application is filed for production of additional documents. It is submitted that those documents would throw light on the workload. Even otherwise, the non-applicants have every right to controvert the said documents, if they are allowed to be produced. 3.

Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". 4.

The Civil application is disposed of. No costs. ( S.G. DIGE ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE mtk