Sharad Bhausaheb Pawale v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

8247.23wp (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 34 WRIT PETITION NO.8247 OF 2023 SHARAD BHAUSAHEB PAWALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ....

Ms Pratiksha Chhaburao Kale, Advocate for Petitioner; Mr S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for Respondents/State CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 17th July, 2023 PER COURT:

1.

The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (B) and (C) as under:- "B. This Hon'ble Court please to pass necessary writ, order or direction to respondent no 2 and 3 to implement the Matoshree Gramsamruddhi Shet/ Panand Raste Yojana through convergence of Various Schemes in Parner Taluka as well as all over the entire district as per the Government Resolution Dated 11/11/2021.

C. This Hon'ble Court please to pass necessary writ, order or direction to decide the representation of the respondent dated 22/05/2023 tender by petitioner to respondent no. 2." 2.

Reliance is placed on the Government Resolution dated 27/02/2018, and it is prayed that the concerned Committee

8247.23wp (2) known as the 'Gramstariya Samiti' be constituted expeditiously and the Petitioner's representation may be decided within a time frame.

3.

It is informed that the Government Resolution dated 27/02/2018 has now been repealed by the Government Resolution dated 11/11/2021. The Petitioner will now have to approach the Taluka Level Committee headed by the Tahsildar. The Petitioner has moved an application along with several others, all dated 29/10/2018, addressed to the Tahsildar.

4.

As such, in view of the Government Resolution dated 11/11/2021, more particularly, Clause 19, the Taluka Level Committee shall decide the grievance of the Petitioner as well as the similarly situated persons, by following the due procedure laid down in law, and by giving an opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders. A reasoned order would be passed after the proceedings are concluded. Let such exercise be completed within 60 days. The decision arrived at, would be conveyed to the Petitioner and others, expeditiously.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk