Dnyanoba Santuk Chate v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 939-wp-2711-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 WRIT PETITION NO.2711 OF 2021 DNYANOBA SANTUK CHATE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondents-State. ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED : 11th FEBRUARY, 2021.

PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard Mr. Kedar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P.

2.

At this stage we are not inclined to consider the prayer made by the petitioner. The orders passed were quasi judicial in nature.

However, if upon enquiry of the proceeding it transpires that the act was done by the Authority under malafide, then the petitioner may agitate his grievance.

3.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/February-2021