Meerabai Arun Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

966-CA-5150-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 966 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5150 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16974 OF 2019 MEERABAI ARUN PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. B.K. Pawar h/f. Mr. A.B. Kale - Advocate for Applicant Mr. S.P. Tiwari - AGP for Respondent No.1, State ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 11th July, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 133 days, which appears to be caused due to her poor financial condition. The learned Counsel for acquiring body and the learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that, there is also circulation delay.

3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application Pooja K.

1/2

966-CA-5150-2021 is allowed and the delay of 133 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matters belatedly.

4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2