Monika Vikrant Manekar v. Vikrant Vijay Manekar

- 1 - mca153.24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 60 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 153 OF 2024 Monika Vikrant Manekar ....Applicant

VERSUS

Vikrant Vijay Manekar .....Respondent .....

Mr. J. R. Nawale, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. M. B. Pophale, Advocate holding for Mr. P. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent.

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 11th NOVEMBER, 2024.

PER COURT :

1.

This is an application for transfer of marriage Petition bearing HMP No. 507/2024 pending before the Family Court, Nagpur to the Family Court, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. 2.

Applicant is wife and seeks transfer on the ground that it is inconvenient for her to travel more than 450 kms from Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar to Nagpur to attend the said proceeding. 3.

Learned counsel for Applicant submits that the Applicant is working at Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and that prejudice and

- 2 - mca153.24.odt irreparable loss will be caused to her if she is compelled to attending the proceeding before the Court at Nagpur.

4.

Learned counsel for Respondent vehemently opposed the application by contending that except for the alleged distance between two places, there is no reason given for transfer of the said proceeding.

5.

Here is the case if husband is called upon to come to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar for attending said proceeding, less inconvenience will be caused to him as compared to the applicant. This would be sufficient ground to allow transfer application. Hence, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. ( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb