← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/489/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Vasant Bhagwat Papinwar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary Dept. Of Home Affairs Mumbai And Others

2015-11-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav2 pages

cp 489.2015 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 489 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2015 VASANT BHAGWAT PAPINWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .....

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sunil V. Kurundkar APP for Respondent/State : Mr. M. M. Nerlekar .....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 26th NOVEMBER, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

The present contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order dated 09.03.2015 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 151 of 2015.

2.

Mr. Kurundkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authorities ought to have registered F.I.R.. However, they have not done so. This Court, in Criminal Writ Petition No. 151 of 2015, vide order dated 09.03.2015, allowed the said petition in terms of prayer clauses "C" and "D". However, still the respondent has not acted in adherence to the said order.

cp 489.2015 -23.

Mr. Nerlekar, learned APP submits that the application of the petitioner is disposed of. Written communication is also given to the petitioner on 22.09.2015 and details of action are also enumerated. The offences are registered as detailed in the affidavit in reply. 4.

We have considered the submissions. The present contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 151 of 2015. Vide order dated 09.03.2015, this Court had directed the Superintendent of Police to decide the application filed by the petitioner and so also vide prayer clause "D", it was also directed to reconsider the representation dated 15.09.2014. The same has been considered and necessary orders are passed. If the applicant is aggrieved by any such order, the applicant has remedy available under the law. 5.

As the order passed by this Court stands complied, the present Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) vre/