Sachin Raibhan Khajekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2024:BHC-AUG:28535

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 963 OF 2024 ...

SACHIN S/O. RAIBHAN KHAJEKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER ...

Advocate for the applicant : Mr.A.K.Bhosle APP for the respondent-State : Mr.P.P.Dawalkar ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 04.12.2024 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.127/2024, registered with Cantonment [Chavani] Police Station, Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Section 307, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court, by order dated 4th July, 2024, has granted interim protection in favour of the applicant on the condition that the applicant to attend the concerned police station as and when required and to co-operate in the

investigation. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has co-operated with the investigation. 4] The learned counsel for the informant has shown video of the incident on it's mobile. The fight is between the neighbors and there is altercation, resulting into some kind of quarrel.

5] Considering that as per the medical certificate, the injury is simple and that the applicant has co-operated with the investigation. In view of the same, the interim protection granted by order dated 4th July, 2024 stands confirmed, on the following condition :

i] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called by the Investigating Officer.

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

6] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

7] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

8] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC