← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6711/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Asha Uttam Binwade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-07-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane3 pages

1 WP/ 6306 /2015+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6306 OF 2015 Shri Rajendra S/o Dashrathrao Datey Patil .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6711 OF 2015 Asha Uttam Binwade .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 10969 OF 2015 Latika Kishor Narwade .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents ---- Mr. M.A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner (WP/6306/2015) Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner (WP/6711/2015 and WP/10969/2015) Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the respondent/State Mr. A.M. Karad, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 and 3 (WP/6306/2015), for respondent no.2 (WP/6711/2015) Mr. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for respondent no.5 and 8 (WP/6306/2015), for respondent no.4 and 7 (WP/6711/2015) Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.6 and 7 (WP/6306/2015), for respondent nos.5 and 6 (WP/6711/2015) Mr. Pradeep Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr. Y.P. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.4 (WP/6306/2015), for respondent no.3 (WP/6711/2015) ---

2 WP/ 6306 /2015+ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 20/07/2016 ORAL ORDER :

Heard.

2.

Mr. Palodkar, learned counsel for the respondents, Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondents and learned A.G.P. for respondent/State have raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners have alternate remedy by way of election petition. 3.

In light of that, though the learned counsel for the petitioners sought to canvass submissions on merit, we are not inclined to consider the same. 4.

Writ Petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy of election petition or such other proceedings, as are permissible in law.

.

Needless to state the petitioners may take benefit of section 14 of the Limitation Act, as may be

3 WP/ 6306 /2015+ permissible. All contentions of respective parties are kept open.

5.

Writ Petitions disposed of. No costs.

[K.K. SONAWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE arp/