Deva Laxman Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

CP 501/2015 in WP 386/15 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.501/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.386/2015 Deva S/o Laxman Gaikwad ..Petitioner..

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents..

.....

Shri D.R.Jayabhar, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri V.H. Dighe, AGP for the State.

.....

CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE: 30.09.2016 ORDER :

1] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court had allowed the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent - authority and the respondent - authority was directed to take decision upon the said representation within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such a representation. The petitioner had filed a representation on 29.1.2015. No decision was taken as directed by this Court.

2] Learned AGP states that on receipt of the

CP 501/2015 in WP 386/15 - 2 - representation, the Tahsildar had conducted necessary enquiry and decision has been taken on 9.3.2016 by passing an order.

3] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order, which is filed alongwith the affidavit in reply is not correct. The same is an illegal one. 4] If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed, the petitioner has a remedy available to assail the same before the appropriate forum.

5] As the order stands complied, the contempt stands purged. Contempt petition as such stands disposed of. (K.L. WADANE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ndk/c3091635.doc