Satyasheela Rameshrao Nirwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(1) 938 CA-9777.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9777 OF 2021 IN FAST/17881/2021 SATYASHEELA RAMESHRAO NIRWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Vitthal Bhise, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.R. Yadav-Lonikar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. L.S. Shaikh, Advocate holding for Mr. S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for respondent No. 3. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,J.

DATED :

02.08.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

The applicants are claiming condonation of delay of 2476 days in fling the frst appeal. The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that in other similar matters, the delay has already been condoned. The learned Counsel for respondent No. 3 - Acquiring Body has also not disputed the said position. As such, for the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 2476 days caused in fling the frst appeal stands condoned, subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period.

(2) 938 CA-9777.2021.odt 2.

The Civil Application stands disposed of.

3.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde