Bhairvnath Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Through Tis Secretary v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Additional Chief Secretary And Others
2025:BHC-AUG:17062-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 943 WRIT PETITION NO. 7694 OF 2025 Kalika Wadar Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Secretary
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 973 WRIT PETITION NO. 7724 OF 2025 Bhairvnath Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Through Its Secretary
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others AND 993 WRIT PETITION NO. 7749 OF 2025 Bhairvnath Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Through its Secretary
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Additional Chief Secretary And Others AND 1012 WRIT PETITION NO. 7804 OF 2025 Gahininath Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Through Its Secretary
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Additional Chief Secretary And Others AND 1013 WRIT PETITION NO. 7805 OF 2025 Jagdamba Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr. Its Chairman Kailas Gangadhar Pokle
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 1014 WRIT PETITION NO. 7806 OF 2025 Shree Datta Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Through Its Chairman
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Additinal Chief Secretary And Others AND 1015 WRIT PETITION NO. 7807 OF 2025
Nathkrupa Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Through Its Chairman
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Additional Chief Secretary And Others AND 1020 WRIT PETITION NO. 7813 OF 2025 Savitribai Fhule Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Through Its Secretary
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Additional Chief Secretary And Others AND 1027 WRIT PETITION NO. 7820 OF 2025 Dhananjay Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Secretary Madhukar Sahebrav Sayamar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others Mr. Shrimant Mundhe a/w Mr. Amol Chate, Advocates for the Petitioners Mr. A. B. Girase, Government Pleader, Mr. S. D. Ghayal, Addl. G. P., Ms. Neha B. Kamble, Ms. S. S. Joshi, Mr. R. K. Ingole, Mr. V. M. Kagne, Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGPs, for Respondents State in respective petitions. .....
CORAM
: MANISH PITALE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 2nd July, 2025 P. C. :
.
All these petitioners are entities who claim to have deployed their employees under the EGS for the construction of a public road. The amounts of outstanding bills are set out in the prayer clauses in each of these petitions. All of them have tendered their representations seeking clearance of the bills. These representations are pending with the respondent authorities.
2.
We would normally not issue directions for clearance of bills since this amounts to recovery orders.
3.
Therefore, all these petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the representations of the petitioners and carry out a verification exercise. If there are certain amounts which are not disputed, the same may be paid to these petitioners within a period of ninety (90) days. If any amounts are disputed, these petitioners shall be informed in writing by the respondents and they would be at liberty to avail of the recovery proceedings for recovering the disputed amounts. 4.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( MANISH PITALE, J. ) JPChavan