← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13098/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Shrirang Bhika Dheple Through Lrs Shantabai Shrirang Dheple And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-12-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote5 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 90 WRIT PETITION NO.13095 OF 2018 JIJABA BHIKA FULE THROUGH LRS KASABAI JIJABA FUKE AND OTHERS 90.1 WRIT PETITION NO.13094 OF 2018 MADHAV YASHWANTA KATHAR 90.2 WRIT PETITION NO.13096 OF 2018 YEDUBA DHRUPATRAO KALAM 90.3 WRIT PETITION NO.13097 OF 2018 BHANUDAS RAMRAO MHASKE 90.4 WRIT PETITION NO.13098 OF 2018 SHRIRANG BHIKA DHEPLE THROUGH LRS SHANTABAI SHRIRANG DHEPLE AND ORS.

(2) 90.5 WRIT PETITION NO.13099 OF 2018 DADARAO YASHWANTA NARWADE 90.6 WRIT PETITION NO.13100 OF 2018 TEJRAO YADAV JADHAV THROUGH LRS SHUBHADRABAI TEJRAO JADHAV AND ORS.

90.7 WRIT PETITION NO.13101 OF 2018 VITTHAL DAGADU JUNGALE 90.8 WRIT PETITION NO.13102 OF 2018 KASHINATH NARAYAN DHORMARE 90.9 WRIT PETITION NO.13103 OF 2018 SUDHAKAR MITHARAM FIRKE

(3) 90.10 WRIT PETITION NO.13104 OF 2018 PANDURANG SAMPAT BENDE 90.11 WRIT PETITION NO.13105 OF 2018 LAXMAN SHRIPAT SABLE 90.12 WRIT PETITION NO.13106 OF 2018 KRISHNA GOVINDA KAKADE 90.13 WRIT PETITION NO.13107 OF 2018 MAHADU RAJARAM GAIKWAD THROUGH LRS LAXMIBAI MAHADU GAIKWAD AND ORS.

90.14 WRIT PETITION NO.13108 OF 2018 BHIMRAO DHUPAJI GADEKAR

(4) ...

Mr. Ashok A. More, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State. ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATED : 02nd DECEMBER, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

We cannot comprehend the arguments advanced by Mr. More, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Reliance is placed on Section 8 seeking directions against the Collector to pay interest at the rate of 15% per annum cannot be dehors the certificate issued by the Controlling Authority. In the present cases, the Controlling Authority has allowed the application filed by the present petitioner and directed payment towards gratuity with simple interest at the rate of 10% per annum till realization. The certificate issued by the Competent Authority also directs payment of interest at the rate of Rs.10% per annum.

2.

Reliance is placed by petitioners on notification dated 1st December 1987 to the effect that interest on delayed payment of gratuity is at the rate of 15% per annum.

3.

The Collector can only execute the certificate. When the certificate specifically prescribes interest at the rate of Rs. 10% per

(5) annum and that too under the orders of Controlling Authority, unless the said certificate or the order of Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act and Judge, Labour Court is modified, it would not be within the province of the Collector to recover the amount with interest at the rate of 15% per annum.

4.

The petitioners have remedy of appeal under the provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act to challenge the order passed by the Controlling Authority and Judge, Labour Court.

5.

In light of the above, we dispose of the Writ Petitions. The petitioners may take appropriate steps against the said order. In case the petitioners resort to further proceeding against the said order, all contentions of the parties are kept open. The Authority may consider the time spent in prosecuting the present Writ Petitions. No cost.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/December-19