Vijay Sakharam Tawaskar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:30607 1 of 2 930-CA.6166.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6166 OF 2025 IN WP/5874/2022 VIJAY SAKHARAM TAWASKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Mr. S. D. Nimbailkar h/f. Mr. Devdatt P. Palodkar, Advocate for Applicant;

Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 6-State. Ms. Anagha V. Pandit i/b. M/s. Talekar And Associates for Respondent Nos.7-A to 7-C.

...

CORAM :

NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

DATE :

7th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C.:- 1.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 344 days in preferring the petition for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased - Respondent No.7 - Mandakini Chandrakantrao Kulkarni. 2.

Heard Mr. S. D. Nimbailkar holding for Mr. Devdatt Palodkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner; Mr. A. D. Wange, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Ms. Anagha V. Pandit for proposed legal representatives.

3.

The proposed legal representatives of deceased-Respondent No.7 are Respondent Nos.7-A to 7-C. According to learned Advocate for the proposed legal representatives, they are the only legal representatives of Deceased-Respondent No.7. Accordingly, the

2 of 2 930-CA.6166.2025.odt application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). 4.

Necessary amendment be made in the memo of writ petition within a period of two weeks from today.

5.

Application stands disposed of.

6.

Thereafter, the petition be placed before this Court for admission.

(NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) Tauseef