← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9930/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Santosh Subhashappa Mukta v. The Asstt Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Cir 2 Aurangabad And Others

2018-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

( 1 ) 1014 wp 9923.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1014 WRIT PETITION NO. 9923 OF 2018 with 1017 WRIT PETITION NO. 9930 OF 2018 with 911 WRIT PETITION NO. 7456 OF 2018 with 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 7457 OF 2018 with 913 WRIT PETITION NO. 7458 OF 2018 with 914 WRIT PETITION NO. 7463 OF 2018 SANTOSH SUBHASHAPPA MUKTA

VERSUS

THE ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIR 2 AURANGABAD AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Chandak Raviraj R. Advocate for UOI : Mr. Alok Sharma for R/1 to 4. ...

CORAM :

R.M. BORDE & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

31.08.2018 P.C. :- It is informed that the petitioner has already availed of an alternate remedy of appeal and the same is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). It is further informed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the scrutiny report has been drawn by the appellate authority.

( 2 ) 1014 wp 9923.18 2.

In the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the controversy the ends of justice would be met in directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) to decide the pending appeal presented by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from today and it is accordingly directed. Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of.

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.] mub