← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9481/2014admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Executive Engineer, Jalna Minonr Irrigation Division, Jalna Under G.M.I.D.C. And Others v. Jagannath Dadabhau Satpute

2016-10-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD (1) CA NO.9481/2014 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9481/2014 IN FAST/17536/2014 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, JALNA MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, JALNA, UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AND OTHERS

VERSUS

JAGANNATH DADABHAU SATPUTE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.B.R.Surwase Smt.Asha D.Rakh, Adv., for respondent/sole.

...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

Dated: October 19, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

Delay of 1676 days has occurred in filing the present appeal by the acquiring body. Mr. B.R.Surwase, learned Counsel appearing for the acquiring body, submits that before the Reference Court, the present appellant was not properly represented and hence no material could be placed on record before the Reference Court. Learned Counsel further submitted that valid objections are raised in exception to the impugned judgment and as such, opportunity needs to be given to the acquiring body to contest the matter on merits.

2.

Smt.Rakh, Learned Counsel appearing for the original claimants, has opposed for condonation of delay. However, after going through the contents of the AGP/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD (2) CA NO.9481/2014 application and more particularly after going through the fact that the acquiring body was not represented through independent Counsel before the Reference Court, I am inclined to allow this application. Hence, the following order:

ORDER

1.

The application is allowed. Delay condoned. 2.

The Appeal be registered in accordance with law.

3.

After registration of the appeal, issue notice to the respondents in the appeal. Learned Counsel Smt. Rakh appears for respondent / original claimants. Service complete.

4.

Place the appeal for admission on 30.11.2016. ( P.R. BORA, J. ) ...

AGP/-