← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5369/2013disposed offdismissed for default

Appasaheb Kashinath Abuj v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-01-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. U. Debadwar1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5369 OF 2013 APPASAHEB KASHINATH ABUJ .. Petitioner

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .. Respondents ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Chandrakant V. Thombre AGP for Respondent No.1 : Shri S.N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Shri U.B. Bondar h/f. Shri V.C. Patil Respondent Nos.4 & 5 - Served.

Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Shri G.K. Naik - Thigle Advocate for Respondent No.7 : Shri D.J. Choudhari ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.

Date : 07-01-2020 PER COURT :

1.

Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, states that during pendency of writ petition, in view of further developments, the purpose underlying the petition substantially gets worked out.

2.

In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of. ( B. U. DEBADWAR, J. ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ) ...

Gajanan