Appasaheb Kashinath Abuj v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5369 OF 2013 APPASAHEB KASHINATH ABUJ .. Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .. Respondents ...
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Chandrakant V. Thombre AGP for Respondent No.1 : Shri S.N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Shri U.B. Bondar h/f. Shri V.C. Patil Respondent Nos.4 & 5 - Served.
Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Shri G.K. Naik - Thigle Advocate for Respondent No.7 : Shri D.J. Choudhari ...
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.
Date : 07-01-2020 PER COURT :
1.
Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, states that during pendency of writ petition, in view of further developments, the purpose underlying the petition substantially gets worked out.
2.
In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of. ( B. U. DEBADWAR, J. ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ) ...
Gajanan