← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7530/2022disposed off

Eknath Bapurao More v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Others

2022-08-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

*1* 15wp7530a7534o22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7530 OF 2022 AND WRIT PETITION NO.7534 OF 2022 EKNATH BAPURAO MORE & KAMLABAI NAMDEV MORE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Dhage Vaibhav B. AGP for Respondents 1, 2 and 4 : Shri S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respondent 3 : Shri Ravi R. Bangar ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ.

DATE :- 01st August, 2022 Per Court :- 1.

We have considered the submissions of the learned advocate for the petitioners in the light of the prayers put forth. A writ of mandamus is sought to be invoked. The petitioners have not yet approached the acquiring body.

2.

It is prayed that as there has been revaluation of the house properties and the communication has been sent by the Executive Engineer, PWD, Nanded, dated 22.06.2022 to the Sub

*2* 15wp7530a7534o22 Divisional Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Kandhar, the petitioners could claim the compensation based on such revaluation by approaching the acquiring body. 3.

Respondent No.3 has filed a short affidavit in reply in both these matters.

4.

The petitioners have not yet approached the acquiring body and have straightaway approached this Court. 5.

As such, these Writ Petitions are disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to approach the acquiring body and pray for payment of compensation. All contentions are kept open. We expect the acquiring body to consider the representation of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within 45 days from the date of receipt of such representation. kps (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)