← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9420/2015admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Regional Officer Maharashtra Industrial Developoment Corporation Midc At Latur v. Sheshabai Narayanrao Chavan Patil And Others

2016-02-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION 9416 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18148 OF 2015 Regional Officer, M.I.D.C. Latur.

.. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Sadhu Venkatrao Birajdar & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for the State.

Mr. V.V. Ingale, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION 9420 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 17997 OF 2015 Regional Officer, M.I.D.C. Latur.

.. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Sheshabai narayanrao Chavan Patil & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for the State.

Mr. V.V. Ingale, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION 9422 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18140 OF 2015 Regional Officer, M.I.D.C. Latur.

.. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Kusumbai Baburao Mane

& others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for the State.

Mr. V.V. Ingale, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION 9418 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18135 OF 2015 Regional Officer, M.I.D.C. Latur.

.. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Meenakshi Ankush Shinde & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for the State.

Mr. V.V. Ingale, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION 9414 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18144 OF 2015 Regional Officer, M.I.D.C. Latur.

.. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Jankakbai Sheshrao Jagtap & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for the State.

Mr. V.V. Ingale, advocate for respondent no. 1. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2016.

PER COURT :

1.

These are the applications seeking condonation of delay occurred in presenting the appeals.

2.

Heard. For the reasons stated in the applications, applications deserve to be allowed and the same are accordingly allowed. Delay occurred in presenting first appeal stands condoned. Civil applications stand disposed of.

( A.I.S. CHEEMA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb