Komal Sachin Sangle v. Sachin Vilas Sangle

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 181 OF 2025 Komal Sachin Sangle ....Applicant

VERSUS

Sachin Vilas Sangle .....Respondent .....

Mr. S. E. Shekade, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. M. G. Kasturkar, Advocate holding for Mr. S. K. Shaikh, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 19th NOVEMBER, 2025.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned Advocate for the parties.

2.

This is an Application by the wife seeking transfer of matrimonial proceeding instituted by Respondent/husband bearing HMP No. 31/2025 in the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Newasa to the Family Court at Ahmednagar.

3.

It is tried to argue that the distance between the two places is 70 kms. Though there is no any other ground the wife finds it difficult to get a Lawyer in Newasa as the brother of the husband is a legal practitioner in the Court at Newasa. The wife thus

- 2 - apprehends that no Advocate will accept her Vakalatnama. Every possibility of putting pressure is there upon the lady. Under such circumstances, she finds it difficult to travel alone and to attend the Court at Newasa.

4.

Learned Advocate for the husband submits that infact the distance between the two places is hardly 50 to 60 kms. There is no question of having any apprehension in the mind of the wife that she will not get an Advocate. Merely on the basis of apprehension no order can be passed. She thus, submits that the Application deserves to be dismissed.

5.

This Court finds that the only ground made out in the Application is that the Applicant apprehends that she may not get a good Lawyer at Newasa as her brother-in-law happens to be the practicing Lawyer in Newasa. It is further case that taking a Laywer from Ahmednagar would be expensive which she cannot afford. 6.

Considering above circumstances, this Court finds that this hardly can be said to be a ground sufficient to transfer the proceeding from one Court to another. Sufficient care can be taken

- 3 - to see that the wife attends the Court at Newasa. Hence, the following order :-

ORDER

(i) Application stands rejected.

(ii) Respondent-husband shall deposit amount of Rs. 2,000/- towards expenses of the wife for attending the Court proceeding at Newasa. The amount be deposited in the Court itself on each date.

(iii) If there is failure to deposit the amount, the Applicant is again at liberty to apply for transfer. (iv) The Trial Court is expected to decide the proceeding as early as possible, preferably within a period of one year from today.

(KISHORE C. SANT) Judge dyb