Sou Shital Chandrakant Gaikwad Shital Do Sunil Pacharane v. Chandrakant Anil Gaikwad

2025:BHC-AUG:27504 ( 1 ) mca176.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 998 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 176 OF 2025 SOU SHITAL CHANDRAKANT GAIKWAD SHITAL DO SUNIL PACHARANE

VERSUS

CHANDRAKANT ANIL GAIKWAD Mr. R.S. Kasar, Advocate for the applicant.

CORAM

: KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 30.09.2025 PC :- 01.

This Court had adjourned this matter from 16.09.2025 to today byway of last chance. Inspite of that none appeared for the respondent today.

02.

Wife has filed this application seeking transfer of matrimonial proceeding i.e. Marriage Petition No. 4 of 2024 from the Court of learned District Judge, Nevasa to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Ahmednagar. It is stated that already two proceedings are pending in the Court at Ahmednagar bearing Cri.M.A. No. 870 of 2024 under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act and another RCC No. 1625 of 2024 under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. In one of the proceedings, the husband has already appeared. 03.

Considering that two proceedings are already pending in the Court at Ahmednagar and as wife is also residing at Ahmednagar, this Court is inclined to allow this application. Hence, following order :-

( 2 ) mca176.25 04.

This application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). In the Trial Court, the wife shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. If the Trial Court finds that the wife is seeking unnecessary adjournments, the Trial Court shall pass appropriate orders compensating the husband if he personally remains present in the Court. If husband makes request for appearing through video conference, same shall be considered by the Trial Court liberally. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2025/Sep25/mca176.25