Damayanti Narharrao Deshmukh v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
912&913-CA-921-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.921 OF 2016 IN FAST/17992/2015 WITH CA/925/2016 IN FAST/17981/2015 WITH CA/926/2016 IN FAST/17995/2015 LAXMAN RAMCHANDRA JOSHI DIED THR LRS DEVDATTA LAXMAN JOSHI AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Dnyaneshwar A. Bide Advocate for Respondents : Mr. S. S. Dande ...
AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2119 OF 2016 IN FAST/18030/2015 DAMAYANTI NARHARRAO DESHMUKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dnyaneshwar A. Bide AGP for Respondents : Mr. S. N. Kendre ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 12TH APRIL, 2023 PER COURT :
1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appears to be 1/2
912&913-CA-921-2016 caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.
The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods and there is also circulation delay. The acquiring body though served, but remained absent.
4.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matters belatedly.
5.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
6.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE SG Punde 2/2