Shaikh Javed Shaikh Harun v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:1915

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1001 OF 2024 SHAIKH JAVED SHAIKH HARUN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Satej S. Jadhav APP for Respondent/State: Ms. Neha B. Kamble ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 23.01.2025 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2.

The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.0001/2023, registered at Muktainagar Police Station, District Jalgaon, for the offences punishable under Section 363 of the IPC. 3.

This court by order dated 24.06.2024, granted interim protection to the applicant.

4.

Prima facie, the relations appear to be consensual. It is also informed that the applicant and the victim are residing together even today; after the victim has attained majority.

5.

In view of the above, the interim protection granted by order dated 24.06.2024 stands confirmed, on the following terms:

i] The applicant shall attend the police station as and when required by the Investigating Officer. ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

6.

In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

7.

It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

8.

The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE marathe