Khobraji Ashroba Kanse v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Parbhani And ORS
1 973 to 977 & 980 ca 9432-21+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 973 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9432 OF 2021 IN FAST/18188/2021 KASHINATH @ KASHIRAM S/O ASARAM GHODKE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V. D. Bhise AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. N. Kendre ...
AND 974 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10294 OF 2021 IN FAST/18185/2021 KASHINATH NARAYAN NIRWAL AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V. D. Bhise AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. P. Tiwari ...
AND 975 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10295 OF 2021 IN FAST/18217/2021 BABASAHEB VISHWANATH NIRWAL AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, PARBHANI AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V. D. Bhise AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. P. Tiwari ...
AND 976 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10296 OF 2021 IN FAST/18180/2021 RUKHMINBAI DNYANOBA NIRWAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
2 973 to 977 & 980 ca 9432-21+ ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V. D. Bhise AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. R. D. Sanap ...
AND 977 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10316 OF 2021 IN FAST/18215/2021 WITH CA/10317/2021 IN FAST/19065/2021 KHOBRAJI ASHROBA KANSE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, PARBHANI AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V. D. Bhise AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. B. V. Virdhe ...
AND 980 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2854 OF 2023 IN FAST/881/2023 AVINASH BALASAHEB CHOUDHARI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V. D. Bhise AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. P. Tiwari Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. C. P. Kutti ....
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED : 18/07/2023.
P. C. :
1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.
3.
The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for the acquiring body in one matter strongly opposed the applications on the
3 973 to 977 & 980 ca 9432-21+ ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.
4.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.
6.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-