Munja Kishan Netak v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 6825.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1006 WRIT PETITION NO.6825 OF 2020 MUNJA KISHAN NETAK

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Navandar Manish N. AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. A. R. Kale ...

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE: 03rd FEBRUARY, 2021 PER COURT:

1.

We have heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

2.

In other writ petitions involving similar issue, we have relegated the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy i.e. approach the Joint Director. In light of that, we follow the same course in the present matter also.

3.

In light of above, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy. In that event, all contentions of the parties are kept open.

2 wp 6825.2020 4.

For a period of fifteen (15) days, the interim order passed by this Court shall continue in favour of the petitioner so as to enable him to approach the appellate authority and seek necessary orders. 5.

Needless to say, on lapse of fifteen (15) days, the interim protection granted by this Court would come to an end.

6.

The appellate authority shall consider the documents produced by all the parties and shall take decision on its own merits.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe