← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/1926/2019disposed off

Swapnil S/O. Ramesh Vispute And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2021-12-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

cran1926.19 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 942 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1926 OF 2019 SWAPNIL S/O. RAMESH VISPUTE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR .....

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Prakashsing B. Patil APP for Respondent-State: Mr. S.J. Salgare Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rahul M. Gaikwad (appointed) .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR. C. MORE, JJ.

DATED : 8th DECEMBER, 2021 PER COURT:- We have heard learned counsel for the applicants for some time. The applicants-original accused are seeking quashing of crime No. 577 of 2019 registered with Tofkhana police station, Ahmednagar for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 r.w. 34 of I.P.C.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicants now submits that the applicants want to amend the prayer clause seeking quashing of proceedings since charge sheet has been submitted. In response to the query made by this Court, learned counsel submits that the charge sheet came to be submitted in connection with the present crime in the year 2019 itself. Learned counsel for the applicants has also made it clear that the applicants accused have appeared in the case pending before the concerned Magistrate in response to the

cran1926.19 -2summons issued. It thus appears that even though this application is pending since 2019 and even though the charge sheet has been submitted in the year 2019 itself, till this date the applicants have not bothered to file an application for amendment seeking quashing of proceedings.

4.

In view of above, we are not inclined to entertain this application. However, we grant liberty to the applicants to file application for discharge before the trial court if the charge is yet not framed.

5.

Criminal application is accordingly disposed of. 6.

We quantify the professional fees and expenses of learned counsel for respondent No.2 to the tune of Rs.2000/- to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad. (SANDIPKUMAR. C. MORE, J.) (V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/