Bombay High CourtCA/10443/2015admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Regional Officer Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Midc At Latur v. Vasant Ambadas Kale And Another

2016-02-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9061 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18000 OF 2015 Regional Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Habib Mohammadsab Mulla & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. P.P. Kulkarni, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9053 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18122 OF 2015 Regional Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Apparao Ganpati Birajdar & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. P.P. Kulkarni, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9056 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18126 OF 2015 Regional Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Jainuddin Mahatab Jamadar & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. P.P. Kulkarni, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9058 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18129 OF 2015 Regional Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Madhav Vithoba Ghodke & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. P.P. Kulkarni, advocate for respondent no. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10443 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 18132 OF 2015 Regional Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Vasant Ambadas Kale & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for applicant.

Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.

Mr. P.P. Kulkarni, advocate for respondent no. 1.

===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2016.

PER COURT :

1.

These are the applications seeking condonation of delay occurred in presenting appeals.

2.

Heard. For the reasons recorded in the applications, applications deserve to be allowed and the same are accordingly allowed. Delay occurred in presenting first appeals stand condoned. Civil applications stand disposed of.

( A.I.S. CHEEMA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb