Sangita Sakharam Kadam And ORS v. Sk. Rahimoddin Sk. Moinoddin And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 75 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7251 OF 2022 IN FAST/17178/2020 SANGITA SAKHARAM KADAM AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SK. RAHIMODDIN SK. MOINODDIN AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Katneshwarkar S.P. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 30.01.2023 PER COURT :

Heard learned counsel for the applicants. The applicants are claiming condonation of delay of 544 days which appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The respondent though served, but remained absent. Thus, the delay of 544 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

2.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-