Nilakshi Anil Patil v. Nand Kumar And Others

{1} cp 335.16 sr. 43.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 335 OF 2015 IN WP/2059/2014 NILAKSHI ANIL PATIL

VERSUS

NAND KUMAR AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ajay D.Pawar AGP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S.G. Karlekar.

. . .

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] In an affidavit in reply presented on behalf of the respondents it is stated that the decision on the proposal tendered by the petitioner has been taken on 3.9.2016 and directions issued by this Court have been complied with. In this view of the matter, keeping the option of the petitioner to challenge the adverse decision, if any, rendered by the respondents by adopting appropriate remedy open, we dispose of the contempt petition. [K.K.SONAWANE] [R.M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-