Anil Shamrao Patil And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

919 WP 2574 OF 2017.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 WRIT PETITION NO.2574 OF 2017 WITH CA/11935/2021 IN WP/2574/2017 WITH CA/11096/2019 IN WP/2574/2017 WITH CA/9234/2017 IN WP/6316/2017 WITH CA/7874/2017 IN WP/2574/2017 WITH WP/6316/2017 WITH CA/11936/2021 IN WP/2574/2017 ANIL SHAMRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Patil Vinod Prakash AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. K. N. Lokhande Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. S.P. Brahme Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Chaitanya V. Dharurkar

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ.

DATE : 30.08.2022.

PER COURT :

The petitioners' grievance is about unpaid salary according to prescribed scale.

3.

After hearing both the sides, it is clear that the parties are unanimous that the matter would legitimately lie before a grievance committee under Section 79 subsection 6 of the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016. It was pointed out that in a similar matter this Court had directed the Director of Education to undertake a scrutiny as to the allegations regarding unpaid salary. Keeping open all the grievances to be put up before the grievance committee, which is a statutory remedy, the writ petitions are disposed of. 1/2

919 WP 2574 OF 2017.odt 4.

The grievance committee shall take decision within four months of filing of the petition by the petitioners.

5.

All the pending applications are disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 2/2