Ashok Eknath Toge And ORS v. The State Of Maharshtra And ANR

1 ca 12151.11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12151 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 18920 OF 2011 Haribhau S/o Karbhari Toge .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Shri R. V. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri P. P. More, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. WITH C. A. NO. 12152 OF 2011 IN CRA ST. NO. 18918 OF 2011 C. A. NO. 12153 OF 2011 IN CRA ST. NO. 18916 OF 2011 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 28TH AUGUST, 2015.

PER COURT :

.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A. G. P. for the respondent No. 1. None appears for the respondent No. 2.

2.

The reference filed by the present applicant for enhancement of compensation seems to have been rejected by the Reference Court. The reason is given that, there was

2 ca 12151.11 communication gap between lawyer and the applicant and he is poor labourer involving in sugar cane harvesting. 3.

Considering the reasons given in the application, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. The civil application is disposed of.

[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Aug. 15