← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9342/2023delay condonatedrejected

G.M.I.D.C.Through The Executive Engineer, M.I.D. 1, Aurangabad v. Dagadu Magan Palhate And ANR

2023-07-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

1 25 ca 9342-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9342 OF 2023 IN FAST/17412/2023 WITH CA/9343/2023 IN FAST/17412/2023 G.M.I.D.C.THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.D. 1, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

DAGADU MAGAN PALHATE AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R. B. Singare Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. D. A. Bide AGP for Respondent-State : Mr. B. V. Virdhe ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 31/07/2023.

P. C. :

A) ORDER IN C.A. NO.9342 OF 2023 :

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to respondents. Learned counsel Mr. D. A. Bide waives service for the respondent No.1-claimant. Learned AGP waives service for respondent Nos.2.

3.

The appellant - acquiring body is seeking condonation of delay of 330 days, which appears to be caused due to obtaining sanctions at various stages. There is no strong objection from other side and therefore the delay of 330 days stands condoned. 4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. Application is accordingly disposed of. B) ORDER IN C.A. NO.9343 OF 2023 :

1.

Heard.

2 25 ca 9342-23 2.

Issue notice to respondents. Learned counsel Mr. D. A. Bide waives service for the respondent No.1-claimant. Learned AGP waives service for respondent Nos.2.

3.

There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause-B subject to deposit of entire amount of compensation alongwith the interest, within a period of 12 weeks.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-