Rukmini W/O. Limbaji Ragade And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
4-cri.appln.2391 and 1940.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1940 OF 2019 Rukmini W/O. Limbaji Ragade and ors.
..Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
..Respondents ---- Mr. K.A.Ingle, Advocate for applicants Mr. D.R.Kale, APP for respondent Mr. A.R.Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent no.2 ---- AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2391 OF 2019 Shashikala w/o. Radhakishan Salve and ors.
..Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ---- Mr. A.R.Gaikwad, Advocate for applicants Mr. D.R.Kale, APP for respondent Mr. A.K.Ingle, Advocate for respondent no.2 ---- CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2019
4-cri.appln.2391 and 1940 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per T.V. NALAWADE, J.) :- Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
By consent of both sides, taken up for final hearing. 2.
In Criminal Application No.1940 of 2019, the applicants pray to quash and set aside the FIR bearing Crime No.119 of 2019 registered with Cantonment Police Station, Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR is lodged by one Smt.Sejal Salve in respect of the incident dated 19.03.2019 took place at about 12.30 p.m. In the second application i.e. Criminal Application No.2391 of 2019, relief is claimed in respect of FIR being Crime No.422 of 2018 registered with the same Police Station for the same offences. Said report was lodged by one Rukminbai Ragde. In that FIR also, the incident of 18.12.2018 is mentioned. The informant in both the FIRs are related to each other.
4-cri.appln.2391 and 1940 3.
During arguments, learned Counsel for the applicants in both the applications, submit that the parties have settled the dispute. They tender the affidavits of the informant in both the FIRs. 4.
It appears that in the incident, informant - Sejal has suffered simple injuries. As both sides have settled the dispute, Criminal Application No.1940 of 2019 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (C) and Criminal Application No.2391 of 2019 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Rule made absolute accordingly.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [T.V.NALAWADE, J.] kbp