← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7769/2022disposed off

Sunil Onkar Landge And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2022-07-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7769 OF 2022 SUNIL ONKAR LANDGE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS Mr.D.S.Kudle, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.A.R.Kale, AGP for respondent / State.

( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ.) DATE : JULY 26, 2022 PER COURT :

1.

The petitioners have put forth prayer clause B, C and D as under :- "B. To quash and set aside the impugned Government Resolution dated 23rd March 2022 to the extent of direction therein for absorption of the petitioners in another Higher Secondary Ashram School within a State. C. To direct the respondent authorities to continue the services of the respective petitioners in Higher Secondary Ashram Schools where they are working.

D. Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, the respondents be directed not to initiate any action relating to absorption of the petitioners in any other Higher Secondary Ashram Schools as per khs/July 2022/7769

- 2 - the impugned Government Resolution dated 23.03.2022." 2.

We have perused the G.R. dated 23.03.2022 by which both these petitioners, who have been declared surplus, are proposed to be absorbed in another Higher Secondary Ashram School. The grievance of the petitioners is that they should not be absorbed anywhere else and they should be continued in the same school.

3.

The learned AGP submits that both the petitioners are not approved teachers. Yet, on sympathetic grounds, the Authorities have considered their case for absorption and by this petition, they desire that they should not be declared surplus and absorbed at the proposed place.

4.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to address their grievance to respondent No.3. Let such representation / grievance be voiced before respondent No.3. Let all grounds be raised. Respondent No.3 shall consider the said representation as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 60 days from the date of receiving the representation. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) khs/July 2022/7769