Vishwanath S/O Bhikaji Mogale (Died) Dattatray And ORS v. The Deputy Inspector, General Border Security Force, Indore (M.P) And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11095 OF 2022 IN FAST/22674/2009 VISHWANATH S/O BHIKAJI MOGALE (DIED) DATTATRAY AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR, GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE, INDORE (M.P) AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Sonkawade Amarsinha D., Learned standing ASG for Respondent / Union of India : Mr. A. G. Talhar AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. A. A. Jagatkar WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3780 OF 2010 IN FAST/22674/2009 WITH CA/3826/2010 IN FA/2616/2011 WITH CA/3838/2010 IN FA/2611/2011 WITH CA/3842/2010 IN FA/2608/2011 WITH CA/ 3620/2021 IN FA/2705/2011 WITH CA/3772/2010 IN FA/2619/2011 WITH CA/3782/2010 IN FAST/22604/2009 WITH CA/3781/2010 IN FAST/22674/2009 WITH CA/3783/2010 IN FAST/22604/2009 WITH CA/3789/2010 IN FA/1838/2011 WITH CA/3774/2010 IN FA/1833/2011 WITH CA/3778/2010 IN FA/1837/2011 WITH CA/3845/2010 IN FA/1836/2011 WITH CA/ 3848/2010 IN FA/1834/2011 WITH CA/3796/2010 IN FA/2705/2011 WITH CA/3792/2010 IN FA/1831/2011 WITH CA/ 3822/2010 IN FAST/22701/2009 WITH CA/3813/2010 IN FA/1835/2011 WITH CA/3818/2010 IN FA/2617/2011 WITH CA/ 3820/2010 IN FAST/22701/2009 WITH CA/3799/2010 IN FA/2698/2011 WITH CA/3801/2010 IN FA/2701/2011 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR, GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE, INDORE (M.P) AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Learned standing ASG for Applicant / Union of India : Mr. A. G. Talhar

(in CA Nos. 3780/10, 3781/2010, 3826/10, 3838/2010, 3842/10, 3620/21, 3796/10, 3772/10, 3782/10, 3783/10, 3789/10, 3774/10), and Learned standing counsel for Applicant / Union of India : Mr. B. M. Dhanure (in C.A. Nos. 3778/10, 3845/10, 3848/10, 3792/10, 3822/10, 3813/10,3818/10, 3820/10, 3799/10, 3801/10 AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. A. A. Jagatkar ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 04.08.2022 PER COURT :

.

Heard.

2.

The applicants who are legal representatives of original respondent No.4 in the main appeal have fled this application for bringing themselves on record as legal representatives of respondent No. 4.

3.

Admittedly respondent No. 4 has died on 10.04.2021 as per the death certifcate annexed with Exhibit "A" for identifcation.

4.

Though there is delay of 34 days but considering the right to sue, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses 'B' and 'C'.

5.

The applicants to carry out the amendment within stipulated period.

6.

Stand over to 08.09.2022.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J) JUDGE .....

shp/-