← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/3242/2016application allowed

Sandip Eknath Dhangar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2016-06-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema2 pages

cra3242.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3242 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.381 OF 2016 Sandip Eknath Dhangar, Age-40 years, Occu:Agriculture, R/o-Bhaver, Tq-Shirpur, Dist-Dhule.

...APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra ...RESPONDENT ...

Mr.Joydeep Chatterji Advocate for Applicant. Mr.K.S. Hoke Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent.

...

CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATE : 28TH JUNE, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Heard. Perused the impugned Judgment.

2.

After conviction the trial Court has suspended the sentence till filing of the Appeal. Seen reasons stated in the Application for bail. It is stated that the Applicant was on bail during

cra3242.16 the course of trial. The Appeal will take sometime to be decided, as such the Application is allowed. 3.

The sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended till decision of the Appeal. The Applicant - accused shall appear before the trial Court on 11th July 2016. The trial Court shall admit the Applicant to bail during pendency of this Appeal, subject to the Applicant furnishing P.R.B. and S.B. in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) in the trial Court. While admitting the Applicant to bail, the trial Court shall add condition that Applicant shall mark his presence in the trial Court every three months till disposal of the present Appeal. The trial Court shall send yearly report in January, about compliance regarding appearance of the Accused. [A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.] asb/JUN16