Satish Parshuram Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

7-CA-6602-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6602 OF 2021 IN WP/6735/2021 WITH WP/6735/2021 SATISH PARSHURAM SHINDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Paresh B. Patil h/f. Mr. V. D. Salunke AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. A. R. Kale Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. D. L. Momale ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 09th AUGUST, 2021 PER COURT :- Heard learned Advocate for the applicant, learned AGP for respondents-State and learned Advocate for respondent No.5. 2.

It appears that after filing of the writ petition, administrative committee is appointed, the same is sought to be assailed. The writ petition is not yet admitted. Even otherwise, nonapplicant will have every opportunity to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by amendment.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

4.

Accordingly, civil application is disposed of. ( R. N. LADDHA ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE rrd