Ram Suryabhan Khade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

24-WP-6788-14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6788 OF 2014 Ram Suryabhan Khade ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. S.N. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for respondent - State Mr. Ashok Tapse, Advocate h/f Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent no.5 Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate h/f Mr. V.J. Dixit, Advocate for respondent no.6 ....

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED : 01st APRIL, 2019 ORDER :

Despite letter dated 20th March, 2019 it appears that no alternate arrangement of appearance on behalf of petitioner has been made. In the circumstances, Mr. S.N. Gaikwad, learned Counsel stands discharged from appearance on behalf of petitioner in present writ petition.

2.

Mr. Nagargoje, learned Counsel for Respondent No.6 states that factually the purpose underlying writ petition gets worked out since subsequently representation mentioned in prayer clause (A) has been decided and has been further acted upon. In view of the same it 1 / 2

24-WP-6788-14.odt appears that petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the matter. Writ petition is disposed of for non-prosecution. ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ) SSD 2 / 2