Meenakshi Narendra Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 6440.2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6440 OF 2016 Meenakshi Narendra Patil .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. W. Mundhe, A. G. P. for Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 served.

Mrs. Chaitali Choudhary Kutti, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6.

Shri Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 7. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 14 th September, 2017 PER COURT :

1.

Mrs. Kutti, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 to 6 submits that the respondent No. 5 has passed the order as against respondent No. 7, thereby removing respondent No. 7 compulsorily. The copy of the order is placed on record and the same is marked as "X" for identification.

2.

The learned counsel for respondent No. 7 submits that, he does not have any instructions in that regard.

2 wp 6440.2016 3.

In view of the contention of the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 to 6 and the order placed on record nothing remains for adjudication in the writ petition. 4.

The writ petition is accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] marathe/sep.17