← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6753/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Sopan Kachru Mogal And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Aurangabad And ORS

2025-12-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:33661 ( 1 ) 13 CA 6753 OF 2025+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6753 OF 2025 IN FAST/17370/2025 SOPAN KACHRU MOGAL AND ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS ...

Mr. D. A. Bide h/f. Mr. T. C. Sonawane, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State AND 15 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6756 OF 2025 IN FAST/17201/2025 KARBHARI RAMAJI VETAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS ...

Mr. D. A. Bide, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 03.12.2025 PER COURT :- .

Heard both sides.

2.

Applicants are praying for condonation of delay of 3783 days and 3717 days in their respective appeals.

( 2 ) 13 CA 6753 OF 2025+ 3.

Applications are contested by the respondents. I have gone through the reply filed by the learned AGP. There is no material on record to infer any oblique motive on the part of the applicants to prefer the appeals belatedly. The applicants are ready to forgo the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. It is desirable to condone the delay. 4.

Delay of 3783 days and 3717 days in their respective appeals stands condoned on condition that the applicants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. FIRST APPEALS (STAMP NO.) .

Admit.

2.

The learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent nos.1 and 2/State.

3.

Call for Record and Proceeding. Print is dispensed with. 4.

The appellants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) PRW