Santosh Dnyanoba @ Dnyandev Patekar And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra

ABA881.22 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.881 OF 2022 SANTOSH DNYANOBA @ DNYANDEV PATEKAR AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Mr Sanket Palnitkar, Advocate holding for Mr. G.M. Sharma, Advocate for applicants;

Mr S.B. Narwadkar, A.P.P. for respondent CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 2nd August, 2022 P.C.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent.

2.

It is not in dispute that the alleged weapon used in the crime has been recovered. The injury certificate referred to by the learned A.P.P. also reveals that a grievous injury has been caused to by the injured. The learned A.P.P. has also referred to the statements of the eye-witnesses. He has strongly opposed the application for the sole reason that the offence is serious.

3.

The record reveals that the material investigation has been completed. Nothing is to be recovered from the applicants. The

ABA881.22 (2) applicants are young boys having no antecedents to their discredit. No purpose would be served if the applicants are sent behind bars. Considering all the aspects, the application deserves to be allowed. Hence, the following order:- i) The application is allowed.

ii) The order dated 21.7.2022 granting interim protection to the applicants is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. (S. G. MEHARE, J.) amj